The Discovery Call Trick That Therapists Have Used for 40 Years

Good Morning. It's National Clients Day, which is a great reminder to appreciate the people who actually sign contracts and pay invoices on time. In honor of the holiday, I wrote you a cold call opener: "Hey, I’m reaching out to wish you a happy National Clients Day. You're not technically a client yet, but it would be a lot cooler if you were." Feel free to use that on your next call. Let me know how it goes. Now, let's get into today's Follow Up. (:

Sponsor The Follow Up | Subscribe

Think about the last time someone told you what to do.

A manager, a friend, a random person on the internet. Even if the advice was right, your first instinct was probably to push back.

That reaction has a name. Psychologist Jack Brehm called it reactance: the harder someone pushes you toward a decision, the harder you resist.

It doesn't matter if they're right. You don’t like it because you didn’t come up with it yourself.

And this is what happens on most discovery calls.

The rep shows up ready to diagnose a problem before the prospect has even described the symptoms.

"You could be doing this a lot better." "This should really be automated." The prospect isn’t receptive to the ideas and then goes silent for two weeks.

Here's why that happens and what to do instead.

In the 1980s, psychologists William Miller and Stephen Rollnick developed a technique called motivational interviewing for treating addiction.

The core idea they found is that telling a patient they needed to change made them less likely to change. The patient would defend their current behavior, dig in, and resist. Miller and Rollnick called this "sustain talk."

But when therapists asked open ended questions and let the patient describe the problem in their own words, it changed things.

The patient started making their own case for change. They'd say things like "I know this isn't working" or "Something has to give." Miller and Rollnick called this "change talk." And research showed that when change talk went up, outcomes improved. When sustain talk went up, they got worse.

A meta analysis found that this approach outperformed traditional ways of giving advice in 75% of studies. Letting people talk themselves into change beats telling them to change 3 out of 4 times.

Now let’s bring this back to sales… When you tell a prospect what they need, you trigger sustain talk.

They defend the status quo. "Our current system works fine," or "We're not really looking to change right now."

But when you ask the right questions and let them describe the pain, they start selling themselves. "We're spending 10 hours a week on this manually." or "Our team is frustrated." or "We lost a deal last quarter because of it."

That's change talk. And the prospect believes it because they said it.

Robert Greene wrote about this in The 48 Laws of Power.

Law 31 is about controlling the options while letting others feel like they're choosing. The deeper principle is simple: people like ideas they believe are their own.

If you hand someone an idea, they'll try to poke holes in it. But if you let them arrive at the same conclusion through their own reasoning, defend it to their boss, their CFO, and their entire buying committee.

This is why some of the best discovery calls feel like a therapy session. You're asking thought provoking questions that give the prospect room to think out loud. "What happens if everything stays the same?" "How is this affecting your team day to day?" "What would solving this free you up to do?"

Then you sit back and let them connect the dots.

Gong data shows that 11-14 targeted questions per discovery call is the sweet spot. Fewer than that and you're not uncovering enough. More than that, and you're interrogating.

The hardest part of this technique is actually resisting the urge to jump in with your pitch the second you hear a pain point.

If your prospect says, "we're drowning in manual work", every instinct tells you to say "that's exactly what we solve."

But instead, you can let them sell themselves by responding with: "Tell me more about that. What does that look like on a typical week?"

Let them keep talking. The more they describe the problem in their own words, the more ownership they take over solving it. By the time you present your solution, they've already built the case for it in their own head.

Check out The Follow Up Guy on LinkedIn.